Can You Celebrate Women's History Month...Without Women's History?

In 1980, Representative Barbara Mikulski & Senator Orrin Hatch (yeah, that surprised me too) decided a week should be set aside to celebrate the accomplishments of women in American history. 

After conversation with her aide, Mikulski recommended March 2-8th as the week of celebration, with the last day falling on International Women’s Day. Though the month of August is the anniversary of women’s suffrage—the idea of marching in D.C. in August sounded less than appealing. Better to celebrate women with cherry blossoms and sixty-degree weather than heat stroke.

Mikulski and Hatch’s bill passed. And in 1980, President Jimmy Carter announced March 2-8thas ‘Women’s History Week’, because:

men and women have worked together to build this nation. Too often the women were unsung and sometimes their contributions went unnoticed. But the achievements, leadership, courage, strength and love of the women who build America was as vital as that of the men whose names we know so well.

Seven years later, Congress passed legislation for Women’s History Week to become Women’s History Month. In the 32 years since this congressional nod, women’s studies and women’s history programs emerged across the nation.

Because, like Carter, several women gathered together one day and said something along the lines of “Wait, weren’t women there to?” And others were like, “Yeah, yeah they were. Someone should do something about that.”. Those conversations became movements that invited 51% of the historical population to join the party. And that makes all the difference.

Why? Because you can’t be what you don’t see. The sooner young girls see trailblazers, torchbearers, and whoa-women in their history books, the sooner they’ll believe they descend from a long line of strength and capability. Their potential and confidence increases as a result. And young girls soon become young women who actively seek to change society for the better. Because neither activism, nor strength, is gendered. 

However, even with the rise of women’s history, women’s studies, women’s month, women’s marches, women’s groups…women still only comprise0.5% of 3,500 years of written historyZERO. POINT. FIVE. PERCENT.

AND as of 2017, state social studies standards obliged K-12 public schools to cover 737 historic figures: 559 men and 178 women (2 of the women are fictional—Molly Pitcher and Rosie the Riveter). About one woman for every three men. (62% of said women are white).

One organization, known for their continuing education and graduate programs for high-school history teachers, does not highlight one primary source including women in their 50 most important historical documents

So, how should we celebrate Women’s History Month? By demanding a change in curriculum standards for American history. To be more diverse, more representative, more true. A Facebook post is not enough. Nor is a feel-good corporate commercial. Women’s History Month means nothing if women’s history is not taught in a thorough and meaningful way throughout the school year.

State standards will not change overnight. Contact your state representatives. Ask the children in your life what they’re being taught. Look at their history text. Read several books with your children, your friends, your partner, your dog. Host a documentary viewing party with discussion to follow. And continue to read women’s history and learn more about women’s history outside of the month of March. Challenge the existing historical narrative. Doing so challenges current political conditions.